The far reach of ice-shelf thinning in Antarctica

  • 1.

    Thomas, R. H. The creep of ice shelves: interpretation of observed behaviour. J. Glaciol. 12, 55–70 (1973).

  • 2.

    Hughes, T. Is the west Antarctic Ice Sheet disintegrating? J. Geophys. Res. 78, 7884–7910 (1973).

  • 3.

    Dupont, T. K. & Alley, R. B. Assessment of the importance of ice-shelf buttressing to ice-sheet flow. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L04503 (2005).

  • 4.

    Paolo, F. S., Fricker, H. A. & Padman, L. Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating. Science 348, 327–331 (2015).

  • 5.

    Bindschadler, R. A. Hitting the ice sheets where it hurts. Science 311, 1720–1721 (2006).

  • 6.

    Pritchard, H. D. et al. Antarctic ice-sheet loss driven by basal melting of ice shelves. Nature 484, 502–505 (2012).

  • 7.

    Wouters, B. et al. Dynamic thinning of glaciers on the Southern Antarctic Peninsula. Science 348, 899–903 (2015).

  • 8.

    Rott, H., Rack, W., Skvarca, P. & De Angelis, H. Northern Larsen Ice Shelf, Antarctica: further retreat after collapse. Ann. Glaciol. 34, 277–282 (2002).

  • 9.

    De Angelis, H. & Skvarca, P. Glacier surge after ice shelf collapse. Science 299, 1560–1562 (2003).

  • 10.

    Hellmer, H. H., Kauker, F., Timmermann, R., Determann, J. & Rae, J. Twenty-first-century warming of a large Antarctic ice-shelf cavity by a redirected coastal current. Nature 485, 225–228 (2012).

  • 11.

    Rignot, E., Jacobs, S., Mouginot, J. & Scheuchl, B. Ice-shelf melting around Antarctica. Science 341, 266–270 (2013).

  • 12.

    Dutrieux, P. et al. Strong sensitivity of Pine Island ice-shelf melting to climatic variability. Science 343, 174–178 (2014).

  • 13.

    Church, J. A. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Ch. 13 (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1137–1216 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2013).

  • 14.

    Mercer, J. H. West Antarctic ice sheet and CO2 greenhouse effect: a threat of disaster. Nature 271, 321–325 (1978).

  • 15.

    Bindschadler, R. A. et al. Ice-sheet model sensitivities to environmental forcing and their use in projecting future sea level (the SeaRISE project). J. Glaciol. 59, 195–224 (2013).

  • 16.

    Nowicki, S. et al. Insights into spatial sensitivities of ice mass response to environmental change from the SeaRISE ice sheet modeling project I: Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 1002–1024 (2013).

  • 17.

    Levermann, A. et al. Projecting Antarctic ice discharge using response functions from SeaRISE ice-sheet models. Earth Syst. Dyn. 5, 271–293 (2014).

  • 18.

    Lenaerts, J. T. M. et al. Meltwater produced by wind–albedo interaction stored in an East Antarctic ice shelf. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 58–62 (2016).

  • 19.

    Depoorter, M. A. et al. Calving fluxes and basal melt rates of Antarctic ice shelves. Nature 502, 89–92 (2013).

  • 20.

    Holland, D. M., Thomas, R. H., de Young, B., Ribergaard, M. H. & Lyberth, B. Acceleration of Jakobshavn Isbræ triggered by warm subsurface ocean waters. Nat. Geosci. 1, 659–664 (2008).

  • 21.

    Fürst, J. J. et al. Assimilation of Antarctic velocity observations provides evidence for uncharted pinning points. Cryosphere 9, 1427–1443 (2015).

  • 22.

    Fürst, J. J. et al. The safety band of Antarctic ice shelves. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 479–482 (2016).

  • 23.

    Gudmundsson, G. H., Krug, J., Durand, G., Favier, L. & Gagliardini, O. The stability of grounding lines on retrograde slopes. Cryosphere 6, 1497–1505 (2012).

  • 24.

    Goldberg, D., Holland, D. M. & Schoof, C. Grounding line movement and ice shelf buttressing in marine ice sheets. J. Geophys. Res. 114, F04026 (2009).

  • 25.

    Gudmundsson, G. H. Ice-shelf buttressing and the stability of marine ice sheets. Cryosphere 7, 647–655 (2013).

  • 26.

    Gagliardini, O., Durand, G., Zwinger, T., Hindmarsh, R. C. A. & Le Meur, E. Coupling of ice-shelf melting and buttressing is a key process in ice-sheets dynamics. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L14501 (2010).

  • 27.

    Matsuoka, K. et al. Antarctic ice rises and rumples: their properties and significance for ice-sheet dynamics and evolution. Earth Sci. Rev. 150, 724–745 (2015).

  • 28.

    Fretwell, P. et al. Bedmap2: Improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica. Cryosphere 7, 375–393 (2013).

  • 29.

    Rignot, E., Mouginot, J. & Scheuchl, B. Ice flow of the Antarctic ice sheet. Science 333, 1427–1430 (2011).

  • 30.

    Morland, L. Unconfined ice shelf flow. 99–116 Proc. Workshop Dynamics West Antarctic Ice Sheet (eds van der Veen, C. J. & Oerlemans, J.) (Reidel, 1987).

  • 31.

    MacAyeal, D. R. Large-scale ice flow over a viscous basal sediment: theory and application to ice stream B, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 4071–4087 (1989).

  • 32.

    Gudmundsson, G. H. Transmission of basal variability to a glacier surface. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2253 (2003).

  • 33.

    Weis, M., Greve, R. & Hutter, K. Theory of shallow ice shelves. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 11, 15–50 (1999).

  • 34.

    Schoof, C. Ice sheet grounding line dynamics: steady states, stability, and hysteresis. J. Geophys. Res. 112, F03S28 (2007).

  • 35.

    Jenkins, A. et al. Decadal ocean forcing and Antarctic ice sheet response: lessons from the Amundsen Sea. Oceanography 29, 106–117 (2016).

  • 36.

    Turner, J. et al. Atmosphere–ocean–ice interactions in the Amundsen Sea Embayment, West Antarctica. Rev. Geophys. 55, 235–276 (2017).

  • 37.

    Joughin, I., Smith, B. E. & Medley, B. Marine ice sheet collapse potentially under way for the Thwaites Glacier Basin, West Antarctica. Science 334, 735–738 (2014).

  • 38.

    Favier, L. et al. Retreat of Pine Island Glacier controlled by marine ice-sheet instability. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 117–121 (2014).

  • 39.

    Rignot, E., Mouginot, J., Morlighem, M., Seroussi, H. & Scheuchl, B. Widespread, rapid grounding line retreat of Pine Island, Thwaites, Smith, and Kohler glaciers, West Antarctica, from 1992 to 2011. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 3502–3509 (2014).

  • 40.

    Pattyn, F. et al. Grounding-line migration in plan-view marine ice-sheet models: results of the ice2sea MISMIP3d intercomparison. J. Glaciol. 59, 410–422 (2013).

  • 41.

    De Rydt, J., Gudmundsson, G. H., Rott, H. & Bamber, J. L. Modeling the instantaneous response of glaciers after the collapse of the Larsen B Ice Shelf. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 5355–5363 (2015).

  • 42.

    Hutter, K. Theoretical Glaciology: Material Science of Ice and the Mechanics of Glaciers and Ice Sheets (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Tokyo, Terra Scientific Publishing Company, 1983).

  • 43.

    Geuzaine, C. & Remacle, J.-F. Gmsh: a 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 79, 1309–1331 (2009).

  • 44.

    Pattyn, F. et al. Results of the marine ice sheet model intercomparison project, MISMIP. The Cryosphere 6, 573–588 (2012).

  • 45.

    Lenaerts, J. T. M., van den Broeke, M. R., van de Berg, W. J., van Meijgaard, E. & Kuipers Munneke, P. A new, high-resolution surface mass balance map of Antarctica (1979–2010) based on regional atmospheric climate modeling. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L04501 (2012).

  • 46.

    Dupont, T. K. & Alley, R. B. Role of small ice shelves in sea-level rise. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L09503 (2006).

  • 47.

    Hindmarsh, R. C. A. The role of membrane-like stresses in determining the stability and sensitivity of the Antarctic ice sheets: back pressure and grounding line motion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 364, 1733–1767 (2006).

  • 48.

    Weertman, J. Deformation of floating ice shelves. J. Glaciology 3, 38–42 (1957).