Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries

  • 1.

    Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev1 (UNFCCC, 2015).

  • 2.

    Rogelj, J. et al. Zero emission targets as long-term global goals for climate protection. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 105007 (2015).

  • 3.

    Sanderson, B. M., O’Neill, B. C. & Tebaldi, C. What would it take to achieve the Paris temperature targets? Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 7133–7142 (2016).

  • 4.

    Rockström, J. et al. A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science 355, 1269–1271 (2017).

  • 5.

    Fuss, S. et al. Betting on negative emissions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 850–853 (2014).

  • 6.

    Gasser, T., Guivarch, C., Tachiiri, K., Jones, C. D. & Ciais, P. Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C. Nat. Commun. 6, 7958 (2015).

  • 7.

    Popp, A. et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Chang. 42, 331–345 (2017).

  • 8.

    Vaughan, N. E. & Lenton, T. M. A review of climate geoengineering proposals. Climatic Change 109, 745–790 (2011).

  • 9.

    Heck, V., Gerten, D., Lucht, W. & Boysen, L. R. Is extensive terrestrial carbon dioxide removal a ‘green’ form of geoengineering? A global modelling study. Glob. Planet. Chang. 137, 123–130 (2016).

  • 10.

    Rockström, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).

  • 11.

    Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).

  • 12.

    Schleussner, C. F. et al. Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 827–835 (2016).

  • 13.

    Kriegler, E. et al. Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): an energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Chang. 42, 297–315 (2017).

  • 14.

    Popp, A. et al. Land-use protection for climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 1095–1098 (2014).

  • 15.

    Riahi, K. et al. Glob. Environ. Chang. 42, 153–168 (2017).

  • 16.

    Heinke, J. et al. A new climate dataset for systematic assessments of climate change impacts as a function of global warming. Geosci. Model. Dev. 6, 1689–1703 (2013).

  • 17.

    Klein, D. et al. The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE. Climatic Change 123, 705–718 (2014).

  • 18.

    Edenhofer, O. et al. (eds.) Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011).

  • 19.

    Qin, X., Mohan, T., El-Halwagi, M., Cornforth, G. & McCarl, B. A. Switchgrass as an alternate feedstock for power generation: an integrated environmental, energy and economic life-cycle assessment. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy 8, 233–249 (2006).

  • 20.

    National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).

  • 21.

    Roncucci, N., Nassi O Di Nasso, N., Tozzini, C., Bonari, E. & Ragaglini, G. Miscanthus giganteus nutrient concentrations and uptakes in autumn and winter harvests as influenced by soil texture, irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in the Mediterranean. Glob. Chang. Biol. Bioenergy 7, 1009–1018 (2015).

  • 22.

    Herzog, H. J. Scaling up carbon dioxide capture and storage: from megatons to gigatons. Energy Econ. 33, 597–604 (2011).

  • 23.

    Watson, J., Kern, F. & Markusson, N. Resolving or managing uncertainties for carbon capture and storage: Lessons from historical analogues. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 81, 192–204 (2014).

  • 24.

    Rogelj, J. et al. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 519–527 (2015).

  • 25.

    Smith, P. et al. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 42–50 (2016).

  • 26.

    Smith, P. et al. How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Glob. Chang. Biol. 19, 2285–2302 (2013).

  • 27.

    Beringer, T., Lucht, W. & Schaphoff, S. Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints. Glob. Chang. Biol. Bioenergy 3, 299–312 (2011).

  • 28.

    Bonsch, M. et al. Trade-offs between land and water requirements for large-scale bioenergy production. Glob. Chang. Biol. Bioenergy 8, 11–24 (2014).

  • 29.

    Woolf, D. et al. Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat. Commun. 1, 56 (2010).

  • 30.

    Gerten, D., Schaphoff, S., Haberlandt, U., Lucht, W. & Sitch, S. Terrestrial vegetation and water balance—hydrological evaluation of a dynamic global vegetation model. J. Hydrol. 286, 249–270 (2004).

  • 31.

    Rost, S. et al. Agricultural green and blue water consumption and its influence on the global water system. Water Resour. Res. 44, W09405 (2008).

  • 32.

    Sitch, S. et al. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Glob. Chang. Biol. 9, 161–185 (2003).

  • 33.

    Bondeau, A. et al. Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Glob. Chang. Biol. 13, 679–706 (2007).

  • 34.

    Fader, M., Rost, S., Müller, C., Bondeau, A. & Gerten, D. Virtual water content of temperate cereals and maize: present and potential future patterns. J. Hydrol. 384, 218–231 (2010).

  • 35.

    Jägermeyr, J. et al. Water savings potentials of irrigation systems: global simulation of processes and linkages. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19, 3073–3091 (2015).

  • 36.

    Harris, I., Jones, P., Osborn, T. & Lister, D. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations — the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 623–642 (2014).

  • 37.

    Hastings, A. et al. Future energy potential of Miscanthus in Europe. Glob. Chang. Biol. Bioenergy 1, 180–196 (2009).

  • 38.

    Stevanovic, M. et al. The impact of high-end climate change on agricultural welfare. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501452 (2016).

  • 39.

    Bodirsky, B. et al. Food demand projections for the 21st century. PLoS. One. 10, e0139201 (2015).

  • 40.

    Bodirsky, B. et al. Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution. Nat. Commun. 5, 3858 (2014).

  • 41.

    Flörke, M. et al. Domestic and industrial water uses of the past 60 years as a mirror of socio-economic development: A global simulation study. Glob. Environ. Chang. 23, 144–156 (2013).

  • 42.

    Konis, K. lpSolveAPI: R Interface to ‘lp_solve’ v.5.5.2.0 (2016); https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lpSolveAPI/index.html

  • 43.

    de Vries, W., Kros, J., Kroeze, C. & Seitzinger, S. P. Assessing planetary and regional nitrogen boundaries related to food security and adverse environmental impacts. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5, 392–402 (2013).

  • 44.

    Bouwman, L. et al. Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900–2050 period. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20882–20887 (2011).

  • 45.

    Kauter, D., Lewandowski, I. & Claupein, W. Pflanzenbauwissenschaften 5, 64–74 (2001).

  • 46.

    Lassaletta, L., Billen, G., Grizzetti, B., Anglade, J. & Garnier, J. 50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: the relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 105011 (2014).

  • 47.

    Scholes, R. J. & Biggs, R. A biodiversity intactness index. Nature 434, 45–49 (2005).

  • 48.

    Kier, G. et al. A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9322–9327 (2009).

  • 49.

    Pastor, A. V., Ludwig, F., Biemans, H., Hoff, H. & Kabat, P. Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 5041–5059 (2014).