Improving poverty and inequality modelling in climate research

  • 1.

    De Cian, E., Hof, A. F., Marangoni, G., Tavoni, M. & van Vuuren, D. P. Alleviating inequality in climate policy costs: an integrated perspective on mitigation, damage and adaptation. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 74015 (2016).

  • 2.

    Mendelsohn, R., Dinar, A. & Williams, L. The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries. Environ. Dev. Econ. 11, 159 (2006).

  • 3.

    Tol, R. S. J., Downing, T. E., Kuik, O. J. & Smith, J. B. Distributional aspects of climate change impacts. Glob. Environ. Change 14, 259–272 (2004).

  • 4.

    Edenhofer, O. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (IPCC, Cambridge University Press, 2014).

  • 5.

    Field, C. B. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 35–94 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  • 6.

    Hallegatte, S. et al. Shock Waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty (World Bank Publications, 2015).

  • 7.

    O’Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Clim. Change 122, 387–400 (2014).

  • 8.

    Cameron, C. et al. Policy trade-offs between climate mitigation and clean cook-stove access in South Asia. Nat. Energy 1, 15010 (2016).

  • 9.

    Kline, K. L. et al. Reconciling food security and bioenergy: priorities for action. GCB Bioenergy 9, 557–576 (2017).

  • 10.

    Hasegawa, T. et al. Consequence of climate mitigation on the risk of hunger. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 7245–7253 (2015).

  • 11.

    Rogelj, J. et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).

  • 12.

    Poverty: Overview (World Bank, accessed 5 November 2016); http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview.

  • 13.

    Reddy, S. G. & Lahoti, R. $1.90 Per Day: What Does it Say? http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2685096 (27 October 2015).

  • 14.

    Alkire, S. & Santos, M. E. Measuring acute poverty in the developing world: robustness and scope of the multidimensional poverty index. World Dev. 59, 251–274 (2014).

  • 15.

    Milanovic, B. Worlds Apart: Measuring International and Global Inequality (Princeton Univ. Press, 2005).

  • 16.

    IPCC Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change (eds Bruce, J. P., Lee, H. & Haites, E. F.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).

  • 17.

    Schelling, T. C. Some economics of global warming. Am. Econ. Rev. 82, 1–14 (1992).

  • 18.

    Dennig, F., Budolfson, M. B., Fleurbaey, M., Siebert, A. & Socolow, R. H. Inequality, climate impacts on the future poor, and carbon prices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15827–15832 (2015).

  • 19.

    Olsson, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 793–832 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  • 20.

    Krey, V. Global energy-climate scenarios and models: a review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 3, 363–383 (2014).

  • 21.

    Anthoff, D., Hepburn, C. & Tol, R. S. J. Equity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change. Ecol. Econ. 68, 836–849 (2009).

  • 22.

    Anthoff, D. & Tol, R. S. J. On international equity weights and national decision making on climate change. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 60, 14–20 (2010).

  • 23.

    Adler, M. D. et al. Priority for the worse off and the social cost of carbon. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 443–449 (2017).

  • 24.

    Anthoff, D. & Emmerling, J. Inequality and the Social Cost of Carbon. Working paper 2016.054 (FEEM, 2016).

  • 25.

    Stanton, E. A. Negishi welfare weights in integrated assessment models: The mathematics of global inequality. Clim. Change 107, 417–432 (2011).

  • 26.

    Stanton, E. A., Ackerman, F. & Kartha, S. Inside the integrated assessment models: Four issues in climate economics. Clim. Dev. 1, 166 (2009).

  • 27.

    Anthoff, D. Optimal Global Dynamic Carbon Abatement (Univ. California, Berkeley, 2011).

  • 28.

    Budolfson, M., Siebert, A. & Spears, D. Optimal Climate Policy and the Future of World Economic Development (World Bank, 2017).

  • 29.

    Budolfson, M., Dennig, F., Fleurbaey, M. et al. The comparative importance for optimal climate policy of discounting, inequalities and catastrophes. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1007/s1058 (2017).

  • 30.

    Chambwera, M. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 945–977 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  • 31.

    Rausch, S., Metcalf, G. E. & Reilly, J. M. Distributional impacts of carbon pricing: A general equilibrium approach with micro-data for households. Energy Econ. 33 (Suppl.), S20–S33 (2011).

  • 32.

    Liang, Q. M. & Wei, Y. M. Distributional impacts of taxing carbon in China: Results from the CEEPA model. Appl. Energy 92, 545–551 (2012).

  • 33.

    Callan, T., Lyons, S., Scott, S., Tol, R. S. J. & Verde, S. The distributional implications of a carbon tax in Ireland. Energy Policy 37, 407–412 (2009).

  • 34.

    Siriwardana, M., Meng, S. & McNeill, J. The Impact of a Carbon Tax on the Australian Economy : Results from a CGE Model (UNE, 2011).

  • 35.

    Bureau, B. Distributional effects of a carbon tax on car fuels in France. Energy Econ. 33, 121–130 (2011).

  • 36.

    Rausch, S. & Schwarz, G. A. Household heterogeneity, aggregation, and the distributional impacts of environmental taxes. J. Public Econ. 138, 43–57 (2016).

  • 37.

    Williams, R. C., Gordon, H., Burtraw, D., Carbone, J. C. & Morgenstern, R. D. The Initial Incidence of a Carbon Tax across Income Groups (Resources for the Future, 2014).

  • 38.

    Mathur, A. & Morris, A. C. Distributional effects of a carbon tax in broader US fiscal reform. Energy Policy 66, 326–334 (2014).

  • 39.

    Combet, E., Ghersi, F. F., Hourcade, J.-C. & Théry, D. in Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation (eds Dias Soares, C., Milne, J., Ashiabor, H., Dekete-Laere, K. & Kreiser, L.) 277–295 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).

  • 40.

    Buddelmeyer, H., Hérault, N., Kalb, G. & van Zijll de Jong, M. Linking a microsimulation model to a dynamic CGE model: climate change mitigation policies and income distribution in Australia. Int. J. Microsimulation 5, 40–58 (2012).

  • 41.

    Sterner, T. Distributional effects of taxing transport fuel. Energy Policy 41, 75–83 (2012).

  • 42.

    Cullenward, D., Wilkerson, J. T., Wara, M. & Weyant, J. P. Dynamically estimating the distributional impacts of US climate policy with NEMS: A case study of the Climate Protection Act of 2013. Energy Econ. 55, 303–318 (2016).

  • 43.

    Durand-Lasserve, O., Campagnolo, L., Chateau, J. & Dellink, R. Modelling of Distributional Impacts of Energy Subsidy Reforms: an Illustration with Indonesia (OECD, 2015).

  • 44.

    Naranpanawa, A. & Bandara, J. S. Poverty and growth impacts of high oil prices: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Energy Policy 45, 102–111 (2012).

  • 45.

    Yusuf, A. A. & Resosudarmo, B. P. On the distributional impact of a carbon tax in developing countries: the case of Indonesia. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 17, 131–156 (2015).

  • 46.

    Coxhead, I., Wattanakuljarus, A. & Nguyen, C. V. Are carbon taxes good for the poor? A general equilibrium analysis for Vietnam. World Dev. 51, 119–131 (2013).

  • 47.

    Dartanto, T. Reducing fuel subsidies and the implication on fiscal balance and poverty in Indonesia: A simulation analysis. Energy Policy 58, 117–134 (2013).

  • 48.

    Essama-Nssah, B. et al. Economy-Wide and Distributional Impacts of an Oil Price Shock on the South African Economy (World Bank, 2007).

  • 49.

    Van der Mensbrugghe, D. Shared socio-economic pathways and global income distribution. In 18th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis (GTAP, 2015).

  • 50.

    Sánchez, M. V. & Cicowiez, M. Trade-offs and payoffs of investing in human development. World Dev. 62, 14–29 (2014).

  • 51.

    Hertel, T. W., Burke, M. B. & Lobell, D. B. The poverty implications of climate-induced crop yield changes by 2030. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 577–585 (2010).

  • 52.

    Bussolo, M., De Hoyos, R. E. & Medvedev, D. Economic growth and income distribution: linking macro-economic models with household survey data at the global level. Int. J. Microsimulation 3, 91–103 (2010).

  • 53.

    Bouet, A., Estrades, C. & Laborde, D. Households Heterogeneity in a Global CGE Model: an Illustration with the MIRAGE-HH (MIRAGE-HouseHolds) Model (University Montesquieu-Bordeaux IV, 2013).

  • 54.

    van Ruijven, B. J. & O’Neill, B. C. & Chateau, J. Methods for including income distribution in global CGE models for long-term climate change research. Energy Econ. 51, 530–543 (2015).

  • 55.

    Melnikov, N. B., O’Neill, B. C., Dalton, M. G. & Van Ruijven, B. J. Downscaling heterogeneous household outcomes in dynamic CGE models for energy-economic analysis. Energy Econ. 65, 87–97 (2017).

  • 56.

    O’Neill, B. C. et al. Global demographic trends and future carbon emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17521–17526 (2010).

  • 57.

    Burke, M. et al. Opportunities for advances in climate change economics. Science 352, 292–293 (2016).

  • 58.

    Somanathan, E. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 15 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  • 59.

    Feng, K. et al. Distributional effects of climate change taxation: the case of the UK. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 3670–3676 (2010).

  • 60.

    Chingcuanco, F. & Miller, E. J. A microsimulation model of urban energy use: modelling residential space heating demand in ILUTE. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 36, 186–194 (2012).

  • 61.

    Jiang, Z. & Shao, S. Distributional effects of a carbon tax on Chinese households: A case of Shanghai. Energy Policy 73, 269–277 (2014).

  • 62.

    Ekholm, T., Krey, V., Pachauri, S. & Riahi, K. Determinants of household energy consumption in India. Energy Policy 38, 5696–5707 (2010).

  • 63.

    Rao, N. D. Distributional impacts of climate change mitigation in Indian electricity: The influence of governance. Energy Policy 61, 1344–1356 (2013).

  • 64.

    Howells, M. I., Alfstad, T., Victor, D. G., Goldstein, G. & Remme, U. A model of household energy services in a low-income rural African village. Energy Policy 33, 1833–1851 (2005).

  • 65.

    Hussein, Z., Hertel, T. & Golub, A. Climate change mitigation policies and poverty in developing countries. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 35009 (2013).

  • 66.

    Daioglou, V., van Ruijven, B. J. & van Vuuren, D. P. Model projections for household energy use in developing countries. Energy 37, 601–615 (2012).

  • 67.

    van Ruijven, B. J. et al. Model projections for household energy use in India. Energy Policy 39, 7747–7761 (2011).

  • 68.

    Pachauri, S. et al. Pathways to achieve universal household access to modern energy by 2030. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 24015 (2013).

  • 69.

    Hallegatte, S. & Rozenberg, J. Climate change through a poverty lens. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 250–256 (2017).

  • 70.

    Preston, B. L., Yuen, E. J. & Westaway, R. M. Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: a review of approaches, benefits, and risks. Sustain. Sci. 6, 177–202 (2011).

  • 71.

    van Ruijven, B. J. et al. Enhancing the relevance of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research. Clim. Change 122, 481–494 (2014).

  • 72.

    Ahmed, S. A. et al. Climate volatility and poverty vulnerability in Tanzania. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 46–55 (2011).

  • 73.

    Mideksa, T. K. Economic and distributional impacts of climate change: The case of Ethiopia. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 278–286 (2010).

  • 74.

    Brooks, N., Adger, W. N. & Kelly, P. M. The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Glob. Environ. Change 15, 151–163 (2005).

  • 75.

    Stiglitz, J. E. The origins of inequality, and policies to contain it. Natl Tax J. 68, 425–448 (2015).

  • 76.

    Atkinson, A. B. Inequality: What can be Done (Harvard Univ. Press, 2015).

  • 77.

    Bourguignon, F. The Globalization of Inequality (Princeton Univ. Press, 2015).

  • 78.

    Piketty, T. Capitalism in the 21st Century (Harvard Univ. Press, 2014).

  • 79.

    Robinson, J. A., Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. A. Democracy, Redistribution and Inequality. Working paper no. 19746 (NBER, 2013).

  • 80.

    Atkinson, A. B. & Bourguignon, F. in Handbook of Income Distribution (eds Atkinson, A. B. & Bourguignon, F.) 1–58 (2000).

  • 81.

    Rao, N. D. & Min, J. Decent living standards: material requirements for human well-being. Soc. Indic. Res. http://doi.org/cf42 (2017).

  • 82.

    Dellink, R., Chateau, J., Lanzi, E. & Magné, B. Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 200–214 (2015).

  • 83.

    Oladokun, M. G. & Odesola, I. A. Household energy consumption and carbon emissions for sustainable cities — A critical review of modelling approaches. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 4, 231–247 (2015).

  • 84.

    Jacoby, H., Rabassa, M. & Skoufias, E. Distributional implications of climate change in India. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 97, 1–22 (2014).

  • 85.

    Melnikov, N. B., O’Neill, B. C. & Dalton, M. G. Accounting for household heterogeneity in general equilibrium economic growth models. Energy Econ. 34, 1475–1483 (2012).