Putting plasticity into practice for effective conservation actions under climate change

Abstract

Phenotypic plasticity may help species to persist in the face of rapid change, yet we lack a management-friendly framework for incorporating plasticity into conservation practice. Here we emphasize the importance of phenotypic plasticity for management—when and how it matters—and describe three challenges that currently impede its consideration in conservation management. We propose a common language and framework that can be applied by scientists and conservation practitioners that connects plasticity to management actions. Crucially, our framework considers plasticity through the lens of an organism’s ‘fit’ to its environment and how that fit will be impacted by climatic changes. Finally, we present a road map for developing tools to highlight where consideration of plasticity is valuable for effective management.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The fundamentals of phenotypic plasticity for a species.
Fig. 2: The nature of plasticity matters in response to rapid environmental change.
Fig. 3: Matrix of scenarios based on whether plasticity affected outcomes of conservation activities.

References

  1. Meehl, G. A. et al. Trends in extreme weather and climate events: issues related to modeling extremes in projections of future climate change. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81, 427–436 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  2. Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Jacob, D. & Taylor, M. in Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 175–311 (IPCC, WMO, 2018).

  3. Pörtner, H.-O. et al. (eds) Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (IPCC, 2019).

  4. Montoya, J. M. & Raffaelli, D. Climate change, biotic interactions and ecosystem services. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 2013–2018 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  5. Asseng, S. et al. Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 143–147 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  6. Arneth et al. Post-2020 biodiversity targets need to embrace climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 30882–30891 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  7. Turner, M. G. et al. Climate change, ecosystems and abrupt change: science priorities. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190105 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  8. Radchuk, V. et al. Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient. Nat. Commun. 10, 3109 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  9. Charmantier, A. et al. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population. Science 320, 800–803 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  10. Visser, M. E. Keeping up with a warming world: assessing the rate of adaptation to climate change. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 649–659 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  11. Prober, S. M., Doerr, V. A. J., Broadhurst, L. M., Williams, K. J. & Dickson, F. Shifting the conservation paradigm: a synthesis of options for renovating nature under climate change. Ecol. Monogr. 89, e01333 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  12. Beever, E. A. et al. Improving conservation outcomes with a new paradigm for understanding species’ fundamental and realized adaptive capacity. Conserv. Lett. 9, 131–137 (2016).

  13. Pigliucci, M. Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture. (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2001.

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  14. West-Eberhard, M. J. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  15. Thurman, L. L. et al. Persist in place or shift in space? Evaluating the adaptive capacity of species to climate change. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 520–528 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  16. Donelson, J. M. et al. Understanding interactions between plasticity, adaptation and range shifts in response to marine environmental change. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 374, 20180186 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  17. Angers, B., Castonguay, E. & Massicotte, R. Environmentally induced phenotypes and DNA methylation: how to deal with unpredictable conditions until the next generation and after. Mol. Ecol. 19, 1283–1295 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  18. Duncan, E. J., Gluckman, P. D. & Dearden, P. K. Epigenetics, plasticity, and evolution: how do we link epigenetic change to phenotype? J. Exp. Zool. B 322, 208–220 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  19. Seebacher, F., White, C. R. & Franklin, C. E. Physiological plasticity increases resilience of ectothermic animals to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 61–66 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  20. Sandoval-Castillo, J. et al. Adaptation of plasticity to projected maximum temperatures and across climatically defined bioregions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 17112–17121 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  21. Hendry, A. P. Key questions on the role of phenotypic plasticity in eco-evolutionary dynamics. J. Heredity 107, 25–41 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  22. Gomez-Mestre, I. & Jovani, R. A heuristic model on the role of plasticity in adaptive evolution: plasticity increases adaptation, population viability and genetic variation. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20131869 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  23. Schneider, R. F. & Meyer, A. How plasticity, genetic assimilation and cryptic genetic variation may contribute to adaptive radiations. Mol. Ecol. 26, 330–350 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  24. Enbody, E. D. et al. Ecological adaptation in European eels is based on phenotypic plasticity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2022620118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  25. Serrouya, R. et al. Saving endangered species using adaptive management. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6181–6186 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  26. Gaitán-Espitia, J. D. & Hobday, A. J. Evolutionary principles and genetic considerations for guiding conservation interventions under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 475–488 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  27. Valladares, F. et al. The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. Ecol. Lett. 17, 1351–1364 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  28. Raimundo, R. L., Guimarães, P. R. Jr & Evans, D. M. Adaptive networks for restoration ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 664–675 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  29. Oostra, V., Saastamoinen, M., Zwaan, B. J. & Wheat, C. W. Strong phenotypic plasticity limits potential for evolutionary responses to climate change. Nat. Commun. 9, 1005 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  30. Nicotra, A. B., Beever, E. A., Robertson, A. L., Hofmann, G. E. & O’Leary, J. Assessing the components of adaptive capacity to improve conservation and management efforts under global change. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1268–1278 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  31. Thurman, L. L. et al. Applying assessments of adaptive capacity to inform natural-resource management in a changing climate. Conserv. Biol. 36, e13838 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  32. Arnold, P. A., Nicotra, A. B. & Kruuk, L. E. B. Sparse evidence for selection on phenotypic plasticity in response to temperature. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 374, 20180185 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  33. Acasuso-Rivero, C., Murren, C. J., Schlichting, C. D. & Steiner, U. K. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity for life-history and less fitness-related traits. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20190653 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  34. Crates, R., Stojanovic, D. & Heinsohn, R. The phenotypic costs of captivity. Biol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12913 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  35. Jolly, C. J., Webb, J. K. & Phillips, B. L. The perils of paradise: an endangered species conserved on an island loses antipredator behaviours within 13 generations. Biol. Lett. 14, 20180222 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  36. Muralidhar, A. et al. Know your enemy? Conservation management causes loss of antipredator behaviour to novel predators in New Zealand robins. Anim. Behav. 149, 135–142 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  37. Johnson, C. N. et al. Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science 356, 270–275 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  38. Cook, C. N. & Sgrò, C. M. Conservation practitioners’ understanding of how to manage evolutionary processes. Conserv. Biol. 33, 993–1001 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  39. Paget, S., Gleiss, A., Kuchling, G. & Mitchell, N. J. Activity of a freshwater turtle varies across a latitudinal gradient: implications for the success of assisted colonisation. Funct. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14338 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  40. Hendry, A. P. Eco-evolutionary Dynamics (Princeton Univ. Press, 2017).

  41. Faulkner, K. T., Clusella-Trullas, S., Peck, L. S. & Chown, S. J. Lack of coherence in the warming responses of marine crustaceans. Funct. Ecol. 28, 895–903 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  42. Ghalambor, C. K., McKay, J. K., Carroll, S. P. & Reznick, D. N. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct. Ecol. 21, 394–407 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  43. Marshall, D. J. & Arnold, T. When is a maternal effect adaptive? Oikos 116, 1957–1963 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  44. Uller, T., Najagawa, S. & English, S. Weak evidence for anticipatory parental effects in plants and animals. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 2161–2170 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  45. Scheiner, S. M. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24, 35–68 (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  46. Ghalambor, C. K., Martin, L. B. & Woods, H. A. in Integrative Organismal Biology 1st edn (eds Martin, L. B. et al.) Ch. 1 (John Wiley & Sons, 2015).

  47. Davis, J. M. P., van Heerwaarden, B., Sgrò, C. M., Donald, J. A. & Kemp, D. J. Low genetic variation in cold tolerance linked to species distributions in butterflies. Evol. Ecol. 28, 495–504 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  48. Herman, J. J., Spencer, H. G., Donohue, K. & Sultan, S. E. How stable ‘should’ epigenetic modifications be? Insights from adaptive plasticity and bet hedging. Evolution 68, 632–643 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  49. Burgess, S. C. & Marshall, D. J. Adaptive parental effects: the importance of estimating environmental predictability and offspring fitness appropriately. Oikos 123, 769–776 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  50. Leimar, O. & McNamara, J. M. The evolution of transgenerational integration of information in heterogeneous environments. Am. Nat. 185, E55–E69 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  51. Reed, T. E., Waples, R. S., Schindler, D. E., Hard, J. J. & Kinnison, M. T. Phenotypic plasticity and population viability: the importance of environmental predictability. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 3391–3400 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  52. Leung, C., Rescan, M., Grulois, D. & Chevin, L. M. Reduced phenotypic plasticity evolves in less predictable environments. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1664–1672 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  53. Schaum, C. E. & Collins, S. Plasticity predicts evolution in a marine alga. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20141486 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  54. Nevoux, M., Forcada, J., Barbraud, C., Croxall, J. & Weimerskirch, H. Bet-hedging response to environmental variability, an intraspecific comparison. Ecology 91, 2416–2427 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  55. Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S. E. & Lewis, S. C. Increasing trends in regional heatwaves. Nat. Commun. 11, 3357 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  56. Chiang, F., Mazdiyasni, O. & AghaKouchak, A. Evidence of anthropogenic impacts on global drought frequency, duration and intensity. Nat. Commun. 12, 2754 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  57. Cook, C. N. & Sgrò, C. M. Aligning science and policy to achieve evolutionary enlightened conservation. Conserv. Biol. 31, 501–512 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  58. Villellas, J. et al. Phenotypic plasticity masks range-wide genetic differentiation for vegetative but not reproductive traits in a short-lived plant. Ecol. Lett. 24, 2378–2393 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  59. Dai, P. et al. Life-history trait plasticity and its relationships with plant adaptation and insect fitness: a case study on the aphid Sitobion avenae. Sci. Rep. 6, 29974 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  60. Bonnet, T. et al. The role of selection and evolution in changing parturition date in a red deer population. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000493 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  61. Bell, D. L. & Galloway, L. F. Plasticity to neighbour shade: fitness consequences and allometry. Funct. Ecol. 21, 1146–1153 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  62. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, 1930).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  63. Stearns, S. C. & Kawecki, T. J. Fitness sensitivity and the canalisation of life-history traits. Evolution 48, 1438–1450 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  64. Crispo, E. The Baldwin effect and genetic assimilation: revisiting two mechanisms of evolutionary change mediated by phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 61, 2469–2479 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  65. Barnosky, A. D. et al. Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471, 51–57 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  66. Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R. & Raven, P. H. Vertebrates on the brink as indicators of biological annihilation and the sixth mass extinction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 13596–13602 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  67. Cleves, P. A. et al. Reduced thermal tolerance in a coral carrying CRISPR-induced mutations in the gene for a heat-shock transcription factor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 28899–28905 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  68. Chevin, L.-M., Gallet, R., Gomulkiewicz, R., Holt, R. D. & Fellous, S. Phenotypic plasticity in evolutionary rescue experiments. Proc. R. Soc. B 368, 20120089 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  69. Bucharova, A. Assisted migration within species range ignores biotic interactions and lacks evidence. Restor. Ecol. 25, 14–18 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  70. Stockwell, C. A., Hendry, A. P. & Kinnison, M. T. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 94–101 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  71. Eger, A. M. et al. Playing to the positives: using synergies to enhance kelp forest restoration. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 544 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  72. Varner, J. & Dearing, M. D. Dietary plasticity in pikas as a strategy for atypical resource landscapes. J. Mammal. 95, 72–81 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  73. Clout, M. N., Elliott, G. P. & Robertson, B. C. Effects of supplementary feeding on the offspring sex-ratio of kakapo: a dilemma for the conservation of a polygynous parrot. Biol. Conserv. 107, 13–18 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  74. Robertson, B. C., Elliott, G. P., Eason, D. K., Clout, M. N. & Gemmell, N. J. Sex allocation theory aids species conservation. Biol. Lett. 2, 229–231 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  75. Kelly, E. & Phillips, B. L. Targeted gene flow and rapid adaptation in an endangered marsupial. Conserv. Biol. 33, 112–121 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  76. Jolly, C. J., Kelly, E., Gillespie, G. R., Phillips, B. & Webb, J. K. Out of the frying pan: reintroduction of toad-smart northern quolls to southern Kakadu National Park. Austr. Ecol. 43, 139–149 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  77. Williams, S. E., Shoo, L. P., Isaac, J. L., Hoffmann, A. A. & Langham, G. Towards an integrated framework for assessing the vulnerability of species to climate change. PLoS Biol. 6, e325 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  78. Stuart-Smith, R. D., Edgar, G. J. & Bates, A. E. Thermal limits to the geographic distributions of shallow-water marine species. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1846–1852 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  79. van Heerwaarden, B. & Sgrò, C. M. Male fertility thermal limits predict vulnerability to climate warming. Nat. Commun. 12, 2214 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  80. Gauzere, J. et al. Where is the optimum? Predicting the variation of selection along climatic gradients and the adaptive value of plasticity. A case study on tree phenology. Evol. Lett. 4, 109–123 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  81. Schleuning, M. et al. Trait-based assessments of climate-change impacts on interacting species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 319–328 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  82. Hoffmann, A. A., Weeks, A. R. & Sgrò, C. M. Opportunities and challenges in assessing climate change vulnerability through genomics. Cell 184, 1420–1425 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  83. Berkelmans, R. in Coral Bleaching Ecological Studies Vol. 205 (eds van Oppen, M. J. H. & Lough, J. M.) 103–119 (Springer, 2009).

  84. Riddell, E. A., Odom, J. P., Damm, J. D. & Sears, M. W. Plasticity reveals hidden resistance to extinction under climate change in the global hotspot of salamander diversity. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar5471 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  85. Natural England and the RSPB Climate Change Adaptation Manual—Evidence to Support Nature Conservation in a Changing Climate 2nd edn (Natural England, 2019).

  86. Svensson, E. I., Gomez-Llano, M. & Waller, J. T. Selection on phenotypic plasticity favors thermal canalisation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29767–29774 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  87. Bailey, T. G. et al. Embedding genetics experiments in restoration to guide plant choice for a degraded landscape with a changing climate. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 22, 92–105 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  88. Hoffmann, E. P., Cavanough, K. L. & Mitchell, N. J. Low desiccation and thermal tolerance constrains a terrestrial amphibian to a rare and disappearing microclimate niche. Conserv. Physiol. 9, coab027 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  89. Blackburn, T. M. & Duncan, R. P. Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414, 195–197 (2001).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  90. Buckley, L. B., Schoville, S. D. & Williams, C. M. Shifts in the relative fitness contributions of fecundity and survival in variable and changing environments. J. Exp. Biol. 224, jeb228031 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  91. Takahashi, Y. et al. Evolution of increased phenotypic diversity enhances population performance by reducing sexual harassment in damselflies. Nat. Commun. 5, 4468 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  92. Preece, C., Verbruggen, E., Liu, L., Weedon, J. & Penuelas, J. Effects of past and current drought on the composition and diversity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 131, 28–39 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  93. Ducatez, S., Sol, D., Sayol, F. & Lefebre, L. Behavioral plasticity is associated with reduced extinction risk in birds. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 788–793 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  94. Kuchling, G. & Hofmeyr, M. D. Too hot to nest? In a hot summer the tortoise Chersina angulata can switch from nesting to facultative viviparity. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 788764 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  95. Richards, C. L., Bossdorf, O., Muth, N. Z., Gurevitch, J. & Pigliucci, M. Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 9, 981–993 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  96. Davidson, A. M., Jennions, M. D. & Nicotra, A. B. Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta‐analysis. Ecol. Lett. 14, 419–431 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  97. Singer, M. C. & Parmesan, C. Lethal trap created by adaptive evolutionary response to an exotic resource. Nature 557, 238–241 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  98. Jørgensen, C., Ernande, B. & Fiksen, Ø. Size-selective fishing gear and life history evolution in the Northeast Arctic cod. Evol. Appl. 2, 356–370 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  99. Tenger-Trolander, A., Lu, W., Noyes, M. & Kronforst, M. R. Contemporary loss of migration in monarch butterflies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14671–14676 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  100. Mitchell, N. J., Rodriguez, N., Kuchling, G., Arnall, S. G. & Kearney, M. R. Reptile embryos and climate change: modelling limits of viability to inform translocation decisions. Biol. Conserv. 204, 134–147 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  101. Sargent, R., Deere, N. J., McGowan, P. J. K., Bunnefeld, N. & Pfeifer, M. Room to roam for African lions Panthera leo: a review of the key drivers of lion habitat use and implications for conservation. Mammal. Rev. 52, 39–51 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  102. Salinas-Melgoza, A., Salinas-Melgoza, V. & Wright, T. F. Behavioral plasticity of a threatened parrot in human-modified landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 159, 303–312 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  103. Watters, J. V., Lema, S. C. & Nevitt, G. A. Phenotype management: a new approach to habitat restoration. Biol. Conserv. 112, 435–445 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  104. Wang, J. et al. Effects of heterogeneous environment after deforestation on plant phenotypic plasticity of three shrubs based on leaf traits and biomass allocation. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 608663 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  105. Turko, A. J. et al. Choosing source populations for conservation reintroductions: lessons from variation in thermal tolerance among populations of the imperilled redside dace. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 78, 1347–1355 (2021).

  106. Larocque, S. M., Johnson, T. B. & Fisk, A. T. Survival and migration patterns of naturally and hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts in a Lake Ontario tributary using acoustic telemetry. Freshw. Biol. 65, 835–848 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  107. Cook, M. T., Heppell, S. S. & Garcia, T. S. Invasive bullfrog larvae lack developmental plasticity to changing hydroperiod. J. Wildl. Manag. 77, 655–662 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  108. Haddaway, N. R., Mortimer, R. J. G., Christmas, M., Grahame, J. W. & Dunn, A. M. Morphological diversity and phenotypic plasticity in the threatened British white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes). Aquat. Conserv. 22, 220–231 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  109. Angeler, D. G. et al. in Advances in Ecological Research Vol. 60 (eds Bohan, D. A. & Dumbrell, A. J.) 1–24 (Academic, 2019).

  110. Hoffmann, A. A., Sgrò, C. M. & Kristensen, T. N. Revisiting adaptive potential, population size, and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 506–517 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  111. Duncan, D. H. & Wintle, B. A. in Landscape Analysis and Visualisation (eds Pettit, C. et al.) 159–182 (Springer, 2008).

  112. Kokko, H. The stagnation paradox: the ever-improving but (more or less) stationary population fitness. Proc. R. Soc. B 288, 20212145 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  113. IPCC Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Parry, M. L. et al.) 6 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  114. Steeves, T. E., Johnson, J. A. & Hale, M. L. Maximising evolutionary potential in functional proxies for extinct species: a conservation genetic perspective on de-extinction. Funct. Ecol. 31, 1032–1040 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  115. Thompson, J. D. Phenotypic plasticity as a component of evolutionary change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 246–249 (1991).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  116. Seddon, P. J., Griffiths, C. J., Soorae, P. S. & Armstrong, D. P. Reversing defaunation: restoring species in a changing world. Science 345, 406–412 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  117. Translocation of Living Organisms: IUCN Position Statement (IUCN, 1987).

  118. IUCN/SSC Guidelines for Reintroductions and Other Conservation Translocations Version 1.0. (IUCN Species Survival Commission, 2013).

  119. Weeks, A. R. et al. Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective. Evol. Appl. 4, 709–725 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on discussions at the 2020 Ecological Adaptation and Plasticity into Practice (EcolAPP) Workshop. We thank our colleagues C. Sgrò, A. Nicotra and R. Incoll for their participation in the workshop and additional helpful contributions. We thank S. Prasad and M. Lee-Abbott of ThinkPlace, Canberra, for their help transforming the workshop into a successful online event in the wake of COVID-19 lockdowns. The EcolAPP Workshop was funded by a Synthesis Group Grant from the Centre for Biodiversity Analysis (CBA) at The Australian National University (to R.J.F.). We also thank C. Stephens of the CBA for administrative support and encouragement of EMCR initiatives. J.M.D. was supported by an ARC Future Fellowship (FT190100015). We thank S. McMahon for helpful feedback on Figs. 1 and 2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
J. M. Donelson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donelson, J.M., Gaitan-Espitia, J.D., Hobday, A.J. et al. Putting plasticity into practice for effective conservation actions under climate change.
Nat. Clim. Chang. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01706-4

Download citation

  • Received: 01 March 2022

  • Accepted: 18 May 2023

  • Published: 06 July 2023

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01706-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative