Incentives for small clubs of Arctic countries to limit black carbon and methane emissions

  • 1.

    Protection of Global Climate for Present and Future Generations of Mankind A/RES/43/53 (UN, 1988).

  • 2.

    Bodansky, D. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: a commentary. Yale J. Int. Law 18, 451–558 (1993).

  • 3.

    Victor, D. G. Global Warming Gridlock. Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2011).

  • 4.

    Stavins, R. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 13 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014).

  • 5.

    Almer, C. & Winkler, R. Analyzing the effectiveness of international environmental policies: The case of the Kyoto Protocol. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 82, 125–151 (2017).

  • 6.

    IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014).

  • 7.

    Peters, G. P. et al. Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris Agreement. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 118–122 (2017).

  • 8.

    Keohane, R. O. & Victor, D. G. Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 570–575 (2016).

  • 9.

    Barrett, S. Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2003).

  • 10.

    Carraro, C. & Siniscalco, D. Strategies for the international protection of the environment. J. Public Econ. 52, 309–328 (1993).

  • 11.

    Brewer, T. L. Arctic Black Carbon from Shipping: A Club Approach to Climate-and-Trade Governance (International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, 2015).

  • 12.

    Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions) (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1990).

  • 13.

    Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1965).

  • 14.

    Stigler, G. The theory of economic regulation. Bell J. Econ. 2, 3–21 (1971).

  • 15.

    Falkner, R. A minilateral solution for global climate change? On bargaining efficiency, club benefits, and international legitimacy. Perspect. Polit. 14, 87–101 (2016).

  • 16.

    Kahler, M. Multilateralism with small and large numbers. Int. Organ. 46, 681–708 (1992).

  • 17.

    Hovi, J., Sprinz, D., Sælen, H. & Underdal, A. Climate clubs: A gateway to effective climate cooperation? Br. J. Polit. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000788 (2017).

  • 18.

    Keohane, N., Petsonk, A. & Hanafi, A. Toward a club of carbon markets. Clim. Change 144, 81–95 (2017).

  • 19.

    Brewer, T. L., Derwent, H. & Błachowicz, A. Carbon Market Clubs and the New Paris Regime: Paper for the World Bank Group’s Networked Carbon Markets Initiative (World Bank, Washington DC, 2016).

  • 20.

    Abbott, K. W. The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environ. Plann. C 30, 571–90 (2012).

  • 21.

    US-China Energy Collaboration (United States Department of Energy, 2017); https://energy.gov/ia/initiatives/us-china-clean-energy-research-center-cerc.

  • 22.

    Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative (Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment, 2017); https://www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/climate-and-environment/climate/climate-and-forest-initiative/id2000712/.

  • 23.

    Johnson, N. The last holdout among big palm oil businesses joins no-deforestation pledge. Grist (5 Dec 2014); http://grist.org/food/the-last-holdout-among-big-palm-oil-producers-joins-no-deforestation-pledge/.

  • 24.

    Hsu, A., Moffat, A. S., Weinfurter, A. J. & Schwartz, J. D. Towards a new climate diplomacy. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 501–503 (2015).

  • 25.

    Climate Commitments of Subnational Actors and Business: A Quantitative Assessment of their Emission Reduction Impact Report No. DEW/1917/NA (UNEP, Nairobi, 2015).

  • 26.

    Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1 (UNFCCC 2016).

  • 27.

    Nordhaus, W. Climate Clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. Am. Econ. Rev. 105, 1339–1370 (2015).

  • 28.

    Hafner-Burton, E. M., Victor, D. G. & Lupu, Y. Political science research on international law: the state of the field. Am. J. Int. Law 106, 47–97 (2012).

  • 29.

    Dunoff, J. L. & Pollack, M. A. (eds). Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations. The State of the Art. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2012).

  • 30.

    Morgenthau, H. J. Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace (Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY, 1948).

  • 31.

    Keohane, R. O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1984).

  • 32.

    Williamson, O. E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Simon and Schuster, New York, NY, 1985).

  • 33.

    Skjærseth, J. B. North Sea Cooperation: Linking International and Domestic Pollution Control (Manchester Univ. Press, Manchester, 2000).

  • 34.

    Parson, E. A. Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2003).

  • 35.

    AMAP Assessment 2015: Black Carbon and Ozone as Arctic Climate Forcers (AMAP, Oslo, 2015).

  • 36.

    Shindell, D. et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science 335, 183–189 (2012).

  • 37.

    Wallack, J. S. & Ramanathan, V. The other climate changers. Why black carbon and ozone also matter. Foreign Aff. 88, 105–113 (2009).

  • 38.

    Remarks at the Climate and Clean Air Coalition To Reduce Short-Lived Climate Pollutants Initiative: Remarks by Secretary of State Clinton (US Department of State, Washington DC, 2012); https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2012/02/184061.htm.

  • 39.

    Burney, J. A., Kennel, C. F. & Victor, D. G. Getting serious about the new realities of global climate change. Bull. Atom. Sci. 69, 49–57 (2013).

  • 40.

    Ramanathan, V. & Xu, Y. The Copenhagen Accord for limiting global warming: criteria, constraints, and available avenues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8055–8062 (2010).

  • 41.

    Shoemaker, J. K., Schrag, D. P., Molina, M. J. & Ramanathan, V. What role for short-lived climate pollutants in mitigation policy? Science 342, 1323–1324 (2013).

  • 42.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Global Mitigation of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases: 2010-2030. EPA-430-R-13-011 (US EPA, Washington DC, 2013).

  • 43.

    Near-Term Climate Protection and Clean Air Benefits: Actions for Controlling Short-Lived Climate Forcers (UNEP, Nairobi, 2011).

  • 44.

    Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R. & Edmonds, J. A. Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Nature 379, 240–243 (1996).

  • 45.

    Levy, M. A. in Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection (eds Haas, P. M, Keohane, R. O. & Levy, M. A.) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993).

  • 46.

    Edenhofer, O. et al. Closing the emission price gap. Glob. Environ. Change 31, 132–143 (2015).

  • 47.

    Milner, H. Interests, Institutions, and Information Domestic Politics and International Relations (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1997).

  • 48.

    Castro, P., Hörnlein, L. & Michaelowa, K. Constructed peer groups and path dependence in international organizations: The case of the international climate change negotiations. Glob. Environ. Change 25, 109–120 (2014).

  • 49.

    Raustiala, K. & Slaughter, A. M. in Handbook of International Relations (eds Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. & Simmons, B.) Ch. 28 (Sage, London, 2002).

  • 50.

    International Political Economy: Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth (eds Frieden, J. A. et al.) (W.W. Norton, New York, NY, 2010).

  • 51.

    Huijnen, V. et al. The global chemistry transport model TM5: description and evaluation of the tropospheric chemistry version 3.0. Geosci. Model Dev. 3, 445–473 (2010).

  • 52.

    Krol, M. et al. The two-way nested global chemistry-transport zoom model TM5: algorithm and applications. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 417–432 (2005).

  • 53.

    Burnett, R. T. et al. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. 122, 397–403 (2014).

  • 54.

    Jerrett, M. et al. Long-term ozone exposure and mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 1085–1095 (2009).

  • 55.

    Lim, S. S. et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet 380, 2224–2260 (2012).

  • 56.

    Global Energy Assessment — Toward a Sustainable Future (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, 2012).

  • 57.

    Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision, Highlights Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.210 (United Nations, New York, 2009).

  • 58.

    Forouzanfar, M. H. et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 386, 2287–2323 (2015).

  • 59.

    Malley, C. S. et al. Updated global estimates of respiratory mortality in adults ≥30 years of age attributable to long-term ozone exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1390 (2017).

  • 60.

    Turner, M. C. et al. Long-term ozone exposure and mortality in a large prospective study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 193, 1134–1142 (2016).

  • 61.

    Evans, J. et al. Estimates of global mortality attributable to particulate air pollution using satellite imagery. Environ. Res. 120, 33–42 (2013).

  • 62.

    Silva, R. A., Adelman, Z., Fry, M. M. & West, J. J. The impact of individual anthropogenic emissions sectors on the global burden of human mortality due to ambient air pollution. Environ. Health Perspect. 124, 1776–1784 (2016).

  • 63.

    Krewski, D. et al. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality. Res. Rep. Health Eff. Inst. 140, 5–114 (2009).

  • 64.

    Anenberg, S. C., Horowitz, L. W., Tong, D. Q. & West, J. J. An estimate of the gobal burden of anthropogenic ozone and fine particulate matter on premature human mortality using atmospheric modeling. Environ. Health Perspect. 118, 1189–1195 (2010).

  • 65.

    Wang, X. & Mauzerall, D. L. Characterizing distributions of surface ozone and its impact on grain production in China, Japan and South Korea: 1990 and 2020. Atmos. Environ 38, 4383–4402 (2004).

  • 66.

    Adams, R. M., Glyer, J. D., Johnson, S. L. & McCarl, B. A. A reassessment of the economic effects of ozone on U.S. agriculture. JAPCA 39, 960–968 (1989).

  • 67.

    Van Dingenen, R. et al. The global impact of ozone on agricultural crop yields under current and future air quality legislation. Atmos. Environ. 43, 604–618 (2009).

  • 68.

    Global Agro-Ecological Zones V3.0 (IIASA and FAO, 2012, accessed 11 November 2016); http://www.gaez.iiasa.ac.at/.

  • 69.

    Lesser, V. M., Rawlings, J. O., Spruill, S. E. & Sommerville, M. C. Ozone effects on agricultural crops: 15 statistical methodologies and estimated dose-response relationships. Crop Sci. 30, 148–155 (1990).

  • 70.

    Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 8 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013).

  • 71.

    Mortality Risk Valuation in Environment, Health and Transport Policies Ch. 7 (OECD, Paris, 2012).

  • 72.

    Main Economic Indicators — Complete Database (OECD, accessed 8 February 2017); http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/data-00052-en.

  • 73.

    The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act 1990 to 2010 EPA-410-R-99-001 (US EPA, Washington DC, 1999).

  • 74.

    Gross Domestic Product: Implicit Price Deflator, retrieved Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Unites States Bureau of Economic Analysis, accessed 7 February 2017); https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPDEF.

  • 75.

    Klimont, Z. et al. Modeling Particulate Emissions in Europe: A Framework to Estimate Reduction Potential and Control Costs IIASA Interim Report IR-02-076 (IIASA, Laxenburg, 2002).